ATTORNEYS – IS YOUR LICENSE ON THE LINE!
Unauthorized practice of law – seems like
something someone else would do, you would never
engage in it – or be guilty of it – would you?
How about this? Do your paralegals write to
clients and sign letters in their name? or to
the Court, or another attorney.
How many of you know that is a violation of
Opinion 611 of the Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Here’s another question: You are out of town – a
client comes in that you know quite well – he
wants to discuss his case with your paralegal –
wants to know if they think he has a good chance
of winning and what he needs to do to make this
happen. Do they answer him? Absolutely not –
that would be the unauthorized practice of law.
Now if that same client asked your paralegal how
much it would be to incorporate in Delaware,
could they tell him – yes, that does not require
a legal opinion. These are the fine lines your
paralegals need to walk in order to avoid any
unethical practices.
There are several opinions NJ Supreme Court
Advisory Committee on Professional Ethics that
deal directly with paralegals:
Opinion 611, 121 N.J.L.J. 293. at
301 (1988): permits paralegals to sign
letterhead in connection with routine tasks in
many fields of law such as gathering factual
information and documents from governmental
agencies (other than tribunals), but requires
that the paralegal be identified in the
signature. This opinion prohibits paralegals
from signing correspondence to the attorney’s
client or to other attorneys and prohibits
paralegals from signing correspondence to the
tribunal.
Opinion 647, 126 N.J.L.J. 1525
(1990): permits the use of business cards by a
paralegal, provided the paralegal is working
under the direct supervision of an attorney, its
issuance is authorized by the law firm or
attorney by whom the paralegal is employed, the
name [and address and telephone number] of the
attorney or law firm appears on the card, the
paralegal is designated as such on the business
card and the applicable Rules of Professional
Responsibility and Court Rules are followed.
Opinion 665, 131 NJ.L.J. 1074
(1992): recognizes the possibility of a conflict
of interest arising when a paralegal changes
employment, and modifies prior ACPE Opinion 546.
It permits an ethical wall to be created with
appropriate screening and disclosure in the
event that a conflict of interest arises.
Opinions of the N.J. Supreme court Advisory
Committee on the Unauthorized Practice of Law
Opinion 24, In re Opinion 24 of the
Committee on the Unauthorized Practice of Law,
128 N.J 114 (1992), the Court decided
that the evidence does not support a categorical
ban on all independent paralegals practicing in
New Jersey, and in fact, “that given the
appropriate instructions and supervision,
paralegals, whether as employees or independent
contractors, are valuable and necessary members
of an attorney’s team in the effective and
efficient practice of law.” Id, pg. 135
CONFIDENTIALITY
Confidentiality is one of the oldest and most
important rules in the legal profession. Clients
must be able to confide in their attorneys so
that the attorney may best represent that
client’s interests. It may be very easy to
relate a story over lunch or during a coffee
break. Is it ethical? Certainly not! It is very
tempting at times for your staff to discuss a
particularly interesting case, or some aspect of
a case with a co-worker or a friend or even a
spouse. They can deal with this temptation by
deciding, as a matter of policy, never to
discuss anything that concerns your work, with
anyone; or they can limit their discussion to
issues and comments that will not reveal the
identity of your client. Violations of the
confidentiality rule may happen simply by
oversight. Your paralegal may be walking down a
hallway discussing a matter with someone in your
support staff, someone who is working on the
same case. They stop in front of an elevator not
realizing that their conversation is being
overheard by someone around the corner from
them. They have no way of knowing they are
there. One way to avoid revealing information
unwittingly is by making a rule for employees
never to discuss confidential information when
they are in a common area, such as a hallway,
elevator, or cafeteria where they may be
overheard.
Another situation may arise when your paralegal
is at a party with other paralegals. They tell a
paralegal they know quite well a confidential
bit of news - that paralegal promises to keep
the information to themselves, however, they
relay the information to their husband, who in
turn tells a co-worker, who in turn tells a
friend, etc. etc. etc. Within a few days the
information reaches the press and the result is
irreparable harm to your client.
Setting strict standards for your staff is
imperative to your practice.
In
order to avoid the unauthorized practice of law,
a paralegal may not perform the following
services:
-
A
paralegal may not give advice.
-
A
paralegal may not set a fee.
-
A
paralegal may not appear in court.
There are, however, many services that the
paralegal may perform:
-
Conduct interviews, maintain general contact
with client
-
Conduct legal research for review by the
attorney
-
Draft legal documents for review by the
attorney
-
Draft correspondence and pleadings for
review by and signature by the attorney
-
Summarize depositions, interrogatories and
testimony for review by the attorney
-
Conduct investigations and statistical and
documentary research
-
Author and sign letters provided the
paralegal’s status is clearly indicated
-
Attend executions of wills, real estate
closing, depositions, court or
administrative hearings and trials with the
attorney.
More
News >> |